🔗 Share this article

Throughout the initial chapters of the book Authentic, speaker Jodi-Ann Burey raises a critical point: typical advice to “come as you are” or “present your real identity in the workplace” are not benevolent calls for personal expression – they’re traps. This initial publication – a combination of recollections, investigation, cultural commentary and discussions – aims to reveal how companies co-opt identity, shifting the burden of institutional change on to employees who are already vulnerable.

Personal Journey and Larger Setting

The motivation for the work lies partially in Burey’s personal work history: various roles across retail corporations, emerging businesses and in worldwide progress, viewed through her experience as a Black disabled woman. The conflicting stance that Burey faces – a push and pull between asserting oneself and looking for safety – is the driving force of her work.

It arrives at a moment of collective fatigue with corporate clichés across the United States and internationally, as opposition to DEI initiatives grow, and many organizations are cutting back the very frameworks that earlier assured progress and development. Burey delves into that landscape to contend that withdrawing from authenticity rhetoric – namely, the business jargon that trivializes identity as a set of appearances, idiosyncrasies and hobbies, leaving workers concerned with handling how they are viewed rather than how they are handled – is not the answer; instead, we need to reinterpret it on our own terms.

Underrepresented Employees and the Display of Persona

Via colorful examples and discussions, the author demonstrates how employees from minority groups – employees from diverse backgrounds, members of the LGBTQ+ community, female employees, disabled individuals – learn early on to adjust which self will “pass”. A vulnerability becomes a drawback and people overcompensate by working to appear agreeable. The effort of “bringing your full self” becomes a projection screen on which numerous kinds of assumptions are placed: emotional labor, revealing details and constant performance of gratitude. As the author states, workers are told to share our identities – but without the safeguards or the confidence to survive what emerges.

According to the author, we are asked to expose ourselves – but without the defenses or the reliance to withstand what emerges.’

Real-Life Example: Jason’s Experience

Burey demonstrates this situation through the narrative of an employee, a hearing-impaired staff member who took it upon himself to teach his team members about deaf culture and communication norms. His readiness to discuss his background – a gesture of transparency the office often commends as “genuineness” – temporarily made daily interactions more manageable. Yet, the author reveals, that improvement was precarious. After staff turnover eliminated the informal knowledge he had established, the culture of access disappeared. “All the information left with them,” he notes wearily. What remained was the fatigue of being forced to restart, of having to take charge for an institution’s learning curve. According to Burey, this is what it means to be asked to expose oneself without protection: to endanger oneself in a framework that applauds your honesty but declines to codify it into policy. Sincerity becomes a pitfall when institutions rely on personal sharing rather than institutional answerability.

Literary Method and Notion of Opposition

Burey’s writing is at once understandable and lyrical. She combines scholarly depth with a style of solidarity: an offer for readers to engage, to question, to oppose. In Burey’s opinion, workplace opposition is not overt defiance but ethical rejection – the act of opposing uniformity in environments that expect gratitude for simple belonging. To dissent, in her framing, is to challenge the accounts institutions tell about equity and inclusion, and to refuse involvement in practices that maintain unfairness. It could involve naming bias in a gathering, opting out of voluntary “equity” work, or establishing limits around how much of oneself is made available to the institution. Opposition, Burey indicates, is an affirmation of individual worth in settings that typically encourage conformity. It is a habit of principle rather than defiance, a approach of insisting that one’s humanity is not based on organizational acceptance.

Reclaiming Authenticity

She also refuses brittle binaries. The book does not merely toss out “sincerity” completely: rather, she urges its restoration. For Burey, genuineness is not simply the raw display of personality that business environment often celebrates, but a more deliberate correspondence between personal beliefs and one’s actions – a honesty that opposes distortion by organizational requirements. As opposed to treating genuineness as a mandate to disclose excessively or conform to sterilized models of transparency, Burey advises audience to preserve the parts of it rooted in honesty, individual consciousness and moral understanding. From her perspective, the goal is not to discard authenticity but to shift it – to remove it from the boardroom’s performative rituals and to connections and offices where confidence, fairness and answerability make {